Is There Such a Thing as Bad Art? Essay

perchance bad inventionworkistic production closes superstarself to it. One reveals something one doesnt like, and without self-aggrandizing it a further thought one turns away. Or when one does springtime it a further thought, one thinks solo about how the piece of device was, besides not about oneself in relation to it. But is having no response a response within itself. Perchance the judging of art cannot be decided by responses. But rather if one cannot come up to negatively of an artistic statement, instead one can solo come up to of ones inability to find artistic merit.And in that locationfore, to speak negatively of art is really to speak negatively of ones receive lack of imagination or emotional responsiveness. Or maybe one simply does not understand what the function of art is. However, maybe favourable art IS only wide-cut when it incrusts a response. And when one looks back at ones response it is only significant if one notices a change in oneself. Sti ll, these feelings may or may not exist when viewing a piece of art. And if those feelings do not exist it is not because the art is universally bad or penny-pinching.Instead it is because the piece is bad or good to you. Conceivably arts sole reason for existence is to provoke emotion. But then what type of emotion? One may see a gory painting that makes one revolt, but is that good art? Is a piece of art only good because it is popular or trendy? And if so then does bad art become good art when it is decided popular. Perhaps a painting is considered good cadence by how much money it costs. Or maybe it can only be considered good by the qualifications of the artist who made it.If so, would a dactyl painting by a kindergartener automatically be considered bad art while a blank hit the books by a high-minded artist be genius? That is if in fact a experience painting can be determined as art at all. What even is art? Is it only considered art if it is on a canvas? Or can art be on the walls of a edifice in graffiti form? Is doodling in your notebook when bored in Philosophy class art? Or are all these original forms of expression meaningless because they do not have to professionalism of an art picture gallery?I can say in confidence that I take for a reformed socialist view on this. at that places no such thing as bad art but in return there is no great art either. Everything is subjective. There are billions of people living in different worlds, bad only exists to the person and groups of like people. But to be fair so does good. Perhaps instead of questioning, we should simply just let art be. Acceptance that without yin there would be no yang and without bad there would be no good.