Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivation Essay

Intrinsic motivation has been described in many appearances. Amabile, Hill, Hennessey, and Tighe (1994) describe it as the motivation to engage in be direct primarily for its own sake, because the calculate itself is interesting, engaging, or in some way satisfying (p. 950). According to Ryan and Deci (2000) inwrought motivation refers to insideng something because it is inherently interesting or enjoyable (p. 55). Pink (2009) defines inhering rejoins as encompassing three comp onents shore consecrate (the fate to direct your own life), Mastery (desiring to get better at something youre wild about) and mathematical function (the longing to be a interrupt of something bigger and better). When every(prenominal) an employer wants from an employee is compliance, the traditional c oncepts of management will exert. In the teddy that the employer seeks plight, self-direction is more motivation. Amabile (1996), a professor at Harvard Business School, asserts that Without in grained motivation, an individual will either not fulfill the activity at solely, or will do it in a way that entirely satisfies the inessential goals (p. 7). This landed estatement supports that for an employee to be engaged in what they ar doingand satisfy doing it, ingrained motivators are required. If your employees are single completing the tasks given to them because you are motivating them with adventitious rewards, it toilette be expected that when you take the reward away, they will no agelong be motivated to complete the work. out placement MOTIVATIONExtrinsic motivation has been defined as Doing something because it leads to a dissociable outcome (Ryan & Deci, 2000) or the motivation to work primarily in reply to something apart from the work itself (Amabile et al., 1994). An employment of an extrinsic reward is when an organisation motivates their workers to perform by rewarding them with money, such as bonuses, informationd salaries, stock options or b enefits. These rewards are easy to monitor as they stem from results. If an employee is following the organisational procedures and adhering to the rules, the bus can reward. If not, there will be no reward. Its a very common motivator for organisations as its easy to manage. They put one overt view as to think about how the employee feels or if he/she is peevishnessate about their transaction.It made star for extrinsic motivators to work in previous(a) generations. Most employees had one job to do, with a simple set of tasks. For example, a bookkeepers job was to record all financial transactions in relevant journals, creating profit and loss statements balance sheets etc. They were assigned to those ingest tasks. Today, we convey programs like MYOB that does all of that work for us. We are no longer working in organisations where our jobs are routine. Our work has become more tangled and more interesting. forgeers straight off are looking for ways to use their minds an d to be involved in bigger things than just monotonous tasks. while clipping published an article stating that They generation Y just want to spend their clock in meaningful and useful ways (Trunk, n.d.). Extrinsic rewards are not totally becoming less suitable for modern time, enquiry has shown that they can as well as decrease indispensable motivation.consideration of reward erects reported in 128 experiments leads to the conclusion that tangible rewards exd to have a substantially blackball effect on ingrained motivation. Although rewards can control statesbehaviour.reward contingencies undermine pots taking responsibility for motivating or regulating themselves. (Deci, Koestner, & Ryan, 1999, p. 658-659)Extrinsic rewards can similarly cause people to stand interest completely in the activity. Decis research cerebrate that when money is employ as an external reward for some activity, the subjects lose intrinsic interest for the activity (1971, p. 114). Furthermo re, Amabile (1996) states that A number of studies have shown that a primarily intrinsic motivation will be more conducive to creativity than a primarily extrinsic motivation (p. 7).THE CANDLE enigmaThe candle problem was a behavioural study developed by psychologist Karl Duncker (1945). He had numerous people that he split into two ag assemblys. some(prenominal) groups were given a candle, matches and a boxful of thumbtacks. Dunker told them to stick the candle to the argue in such a way that the wax wont melt onto the table and using only the materials given. The subjects outgrowth tried sticky the candle to the wall with the thumbtacks, it didnt work. Some tried to melt the side of the candle with the matches and adhere it to the wall except to no avail. After a while both groups managed to figure out the solution stick the box to the wall with the thumbtacks, and put the candle inside it.A scientist named Sam Glucksberg (1962) create the candle problem but gave the subj ects incentives. The first group were not offered a reward but told they were a part of a study to imbed norms and see how long it takes the average person to solve the problem. The second group were offered different sums of money depending on how fast they solved the problem. It was recorded that the incentivised group took almost three and a half minutes longer than the non-incentivised group. This research defies every rule that says extrinsic motivators work. In their third edition Organisational behaviour book, Wood et al. (2013) describe extrinsic rewards as being positively cherished work outcomes the individual receives from some other person in the work setting. They are important external reinforces or environmental consequences that can substantially influence peoples workbehaviours through the law of effect (p. 131). The candle problem with incentives has been copied for the past forty years and every time the incentivised group solved the problem the fastest.Glucksb erg prepared the experiment again but this time he handed his subjects the materials separately. Instead of supplying the thumbtacks inside the box, he put them next to the box. For the first time ever the incentivised group click the non-incentivised group. The results suggested that when the problem was made simpler, extrinsic motivators worked better. Extrinsic rewards usually only work for problems that have a simple set of tasks and a right answer. operate oners today are more creative and conceptual and enjoy solving problems. When we have technology that does most of the simple tasks for us, we spend more time try to solve problems that have many possible answers.INTRINSIC MOTIVATION IN TODAYS WORKPLACEContemporary companies are finding and implementing ways to motivate their employees by using intrinsic rewards. The best example would be Google Inc. Google is renowned for their immense benefits and modern offices. thither are too many benefits to list them all but some i nclude sleep pods, reading areas, swimming pools, bleak food, free rental cars if you claim to run errands, and some even have on-site child care facilities. One motivator that benefited the union and the employee is the 80/20 rule. Google dont want people to have to leave the company to pursue their personal passions so every employee is to dedicate 80% of their time to their primary job, and 20% of their time working on passion projects that can help the company. Half the products released at Google were invented in the 20% time. E.g. Gmail, Chrome, Google intelligence activity (Mediratta, 2007). Fortune magazine ranked Google as the number one company to work for in the world in 2012 and 2013 ( degree Celsius Best Companies to Work For, n.d.) Its not hard to see why this is the case. Besides all of the above, Google has no real hierarchy (Mills, 2007). They have no official channels, only tiny work groups where ideas flow at bottom the group. If an employee wants to work wit h another aggroup they can without having to ask permission. eyepatch the intrinsic rewards are preferable enough, Google too offer very attractive extrinsic rewards suchas 100% paid maternity leave for up to 18 weeks. Like Google, Atlassian, an Australian software company, introduced a quarterly system where an individual could use 20% of his/her time to work on their own ideas and present them at a meeting the next day. This was called the ShipIt Days (because it had to be delivered by the next day). This one day of autonomy led to 47 internal projects being used within the software company that never would have emerged otherwise, and more than $2 million in sales (Smith, n.d.). Atlassian has also been in the top ten of BRWs best places to work for the last couple of years.Another example of autonomy in the workplace is ROWE (Results Only Work Environment). (What is Rowe, n.d.) writes how employees are evaluated on their outputs and what they achieve at the company, not how lo ng or when they are working. As long as you get your work done, you can come in anytime, leave anytime, not come in at all and meetings are optional. Companies who have implemented the ROWE human resources strategy have seen their productivity increase by 35% and their voluntary turnover dropped among 50% and 90% (Penttila, n.d.).Not-For-Profit (NFP) Organisations are another good example of how intrinsic motivators work to adjudge staff when they are being paid much less than people in the aforesaid(prenominal) position who are working for private companies. Frey (1997) suggested that once an employee receives a wage that is enough to live off, they experience to seek purpose in their work. A case study by Tippet & Kluvers (2009) researching motivation in NFP organisations showed that most employees were satisfied with their pay. This research shows that because they see their pay as sufficient, intrinsic motivation may be more of an importance. Pink asserts that Effective orga nizations remediate people in amounts and in ways that allow individuals to mostly bar about compensation and instead centre on the work itself (2009, p. 170). In other words, get the issue of money off the table first so employees arent feeling mistreated or de-motivated, then focus on on intrinsic motivators.LEADERSHIP APPROACHESdoubting Thomas (2009) suggests that to increase intrinsic motivation you should beginto de-emphasise money as a motivating factor. By paying your employees fairly, but not offering monetary rewards, they will begin to achieve goals for the satisfaction. Usually when you offer rewards employees may only just do what is asked of them, rather than expiry one step further. Organisations not only need to change the way they motivate their employees, they also need to realise that not everyone will be motivated by the same intrinsic reward. Ryan and Deci (2000) state that People are intrinsically motivated for some activities and not others, and not everyo ne is intrinsically motivated for any particular task (p. 56). As expected, humanness do not have the same passions in life and the same goals, therefore we cannot expect them to be motivated by the same rewards.While Google Inc. has a wide range of benefits that should suit most employees, they have also employed a Chief Culture Czar whose main job is devoted to making sure everyone is happy. Google have an annual global quite a little that is focused on finding out how happy their employees are, and what its going to take to keep them with the company. The current CCC, Stacey Sullivan, has said of the survey career development is more of a focus than giving more stock options or increasing salaries (Mills, 2007).Thomas (2009) suggests identifying shared passions within an organisation so focus can be on achieving the desired goal. When passions are clarified and set its much easier to pursue them in a systematic way. A team unifies when they discover that passion Aha, thats wha t we care about. Now lets go after(prenominal) it (Thomas, 2009, p. 155). Teammates are then likely to unify and see each other as partners with a shared purpose.For a leader to be successful in building employee engagement within an organisation, they need to be aware of what drives them and how to manage their own intrinsic rewards. Thomas (2009) declares that Developing this skill helps you recognize the intrinsic rewards in your employees, gives you more credibility, and as a bonus helps you stay more engaged and energized (p. 193).Employee Engagementmany people define employee engagement differently, but according to Thomas (2009) employee engagement is the phrase used to describe the motivation needed in organisations today. In the 80s and 90s it was empowerment and in the 70s it was enrichment. As work becomes more demanding and supervision slackens the need for workers to be psychologically engaged (Thomas, 2009, p. 11) when performing their work is essential. Although e mployee engagement itself can be defined in many ways, Macey and Schneider assert that it is a desirable condition, has an organizational purpose, and connotes involvement, commitment, passion, enthusiasm, focused effort and energy (2008, p. 4). Thomas defines employee engagement as active self-management that has four key intrinsic rewards the sense of meaningfulness, the sense of choice, the sense of competence, and the sense of progress. These four intrinsic rewards are the psychological critical signs of an engaged workforce (2009, p. 192).Employee engagement is valuable for any organisation as it can breed employee loyalty. When an employee is loyal they contribute to moving the company onwards and help it reach its goals. Lockwood (2007) emphasizes the link of engagement to business success after a survey of 50,000 employees in 27 countries revealed that Organizations that have a highly engaged workforce were found to have almost 10 times as many committed, high-effort worke rs as those with a low-engaged workforce. The findings point to the manager as the most important enabler of employee commitment to the organization, job and work-teams (p. 9).CONCLUSIONThe effects of intrinsic and extrinsic rewards have long been debated and will continue to be examined as psychologists and researches alike try and find the answer. This paper was intended to add the reader with a worthy argument as to why intrinsic motivators are becoming a more obvious style of management. There are many examples of organisations focusing on intrinsic motivators and the effect they have on the success of a company. As Pink (2009) suggests, while extrinsic rewards are becoming less relatable in modern times, they should not be thrown out altogether, as one must still be satisfied with their pay to allow intrinsic motivators to work. Theevidence readily easy today should be enough to convince more organisations to introduce intrinsic motivation and decrease the importance of extri nsic rewards with their companies.REFERENCE LISTAmabile, T.M. (1996) creativeness and Innovation in Organizations. Harvard Business School 100 Best Places to Work For. n.d.. Retrieved from the CNN Money Website http//money.cnn.com/magazines/fortune/best-companies/index.htmlDeci, E. L. (1971). Effects of externally mediated rewards on intrinsic motivation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 18(1), 105-115Deci, E. L., Koestner, R., & Ryan, R.M. (1999). A meta-analytic review of experiments examining the effects of extrinsic rewards on intrinsic motivation. psychological Bulletin, 125(6), 627-668Drucker, P. F. (1974). Management Tasks, Responsibilities, Practices.Oxford, England Butterworth-HeinemannDunker, K. (1945). On Problem Solving. Psychological Monographs.Washington, DC American Psychological AssociationFrey, B.S. (1997). On the Relationship between Intrinsic and Extrinsic Work Motivation1. International Journal of Industrial Organisation, 15(4), 427-439Glatzeder, B. , Goel, V., Meuller, A.C. (2010). Towards a theory of thinking. Retrieved from http//www.yorku.ca/vgoel/courses/3260/Goel_3260_articles/Article_7.pdfGlucksberg, S. (1962). The influence of strength of drive on functional stationariness and perceptual recognition. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 63(1), 36-41. doi10.1037/h0044683Lockwood, N.R. (2007). Leveraging Employee Engagement for competitoryAdvantage HRs Strategic Role. SHRM investigate Quarterly Retrieved from http//198.22.197.80/Research/Articles/Articles/Documents/07MarResearchQuarterly.pdfMacey, W. H., Schneider, B. (2008). The Meaning of Employee Engagement. Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 1, 3-30 Mediratta, B. n.d.. The Google Way Give Engineers Room. Retrieved from the New York measure Website http//www.nytimes.com/2007/10/21/jobs/21pre.html?_r=0Penttila, C. n.d.. Off the Clock Flexibility is the workstyle of the time to come. Retrieved from the Entrepreneur Website http//www.entrepreneur.com/article/177 070Pink, D. H. (2009). Drive. The Surprising Truth About What Motivates Us.New York, the States Penguin Books LtdRyan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and Extrinsic Motivations Classic Definitions and New Directions. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 25, 54-67. doi10.1006/ceps.1999.1020Smith, F. n.d.. Is Atlassian the coolest company in Australia?. Retrieved from the BRW website http//www.brw.com.au/p/sections/features/is_atlassian_the_coolest_company_877SCYxXLwl7N9cNiMF6vJTippet, J., & Kluvers, R. (2009). Employee Rewards and Motivation in Non Profit Organisations theatrical role Study from Australia. International Journal of Business and Management, 4(3), 7.Trunk, P. n.d.. What Gen Y Really Wants?. Retrieved from the Time Magazine website http//www.time.com/time/magazine/article/0,9171,1640395,00.htmlWhat is Rowe. n.d.. Retrieved from the Go Rowe Website http//www.gorowe.com/main/what-is-rowe/ Wood, J., Zeffane, R., Fromholtz,